Skip to main content

AI-Powered Platform Engineering: Best Practices for AI Governance, Developer Productivity & MLOps [2025 Guide]

· 24 min read

🎙️ Listen to the podcast episode: AI-Powered Platform Engineering: Beyond the Hype - A deep dive conversation exploring AI governance, Shadow AI challenges, and practical implementation strategies with real-world examples.

Quick Answer (TL;DR)​

Problem: 85% of organizations face Shadow AI challenges—employees using unauthorized AI tools without governance, creating security and compliance risks.

Solution: Implement a 4-phase AI platform engineering approach: (1) AI governance through platforms like Portkey or TrueFoundry, (2) Deploy AI code assistants with guardrails, (3) Implement AIOps for observability, (4) Build MLOps infrastructure for AI workloads.

ROI Data: Real deployments show 90% alert noise reduction, 96% false positive reduction, 50% cost savings, and 55% faster developer task completion.

Timeline: 16-40 weeks for full implementation across all phases.

Key Tools: Portkey (AI gateway), GitHub Copilot (code assistant), Elastic AIOps (observability), Kubeflow/MLflow (MLOps).

Key Statistics (2024-2025 Data)​

MetricValueSource
Shadow AI Adoption85% of employees use unauthorized AI toolsManageEngine, 2024
GenAI Traffic Growth890% increase in 2024Palo Alto Networks, 2025
Alert Noise Reduction90% with Edwin AILogicMonitor, 2024
False Positive Reduction96% with Elastic AI (523→22 alerts/week)Elastic/Hexaware, 2024
Cost Savings50% reduction in observability costsInformatica/Elastic, 2024
Developer Productivity55% faster task completionGitHub Research, 2024
Job Satisfaction60-75% higher with AI code assistantsGitHub Research, 2024
AI Importance94% say AI is critical/important to platform engineeringRed Hat, October 2024
Market Growth$11.3B (2023) → $51.8B (2028), 35.6% CAGRResearch and Markets
Enterprise Copilot Adoption82% of large organizationsVentureBeat, 2024

85% of IT decision-makers report developers are adopting AI tools faster than their teams can assess them. GenAI traffic surged 890% across Asia-Pacific and Japan in 2024. Yet 93% of employees admit to using AI tools without approval, while only 54% of IT leaders say their policies on unauthorized AI use are effective.

Welcome to AI-powered platform engineering in 2025—where the opportunity is massive, the risks are real, and platform teams are caught between enabling innovation and preventing chaos.

The Shadow AI Crisis Nobody Saw Coming​

Let's start with the uncomfortable truth: Shadow AI is the new Shadow IT, and it's everywhere.

Your developers are already using AI. They're integrating LLMs into production workflows without approval. They're bypassing security reviews, routing customer data through unsecured endpoints, and creating compliance nightmares.

According to ManageEngine's Shadow AI report, 85% of IT decision-makers say employees adopt AI tools faster than IT can assess them. The data is alarming: 70% of IT leaders have identified unauthorized AI use within their organizations, and 60% of employees are using unapproved AI tools more than they were a year ago.

The kicker? GenAI traffic increased 890% in 2024 according to Palo Alto Networks' State of Generative AI 2025 report, analyzing data from 7,051 global customers.

As one security researcher put it: "Shadow AI risks are highest in serverless environments, containerized workloads, and API-driven applications, where AI services can be easily embedded without formal security reviews."

💡 Key Takeaway

Shadow AI affects 85% of organizations, with GenAI traffic surging 890% in 2024. Deploy an AI gateway platform like Portkey or TrueFoundry to provide secure, governed access to 100+ LLMs instead of blocking developer innovation.

The Three Big Questions Platform Teams Are Wrestling With​

Before we dive into solutions, let's address the questions keeping platform engineers up at night:

1. How do we integrate AI models without creating shadow IT?​

The traditional approach—blocking everything and requiring approvals—doesn't work. Developers will find workarounds. They always do.

The New Stack's analysis shows that LLM APIs and tools used without approval often bypass standard security practices: no encryption, no API key management, no isolation of workloads, and sensitive data routed through third-party services.

The better approach? Provide guardrails, not roadblocks. Offer secure, internal gateways to approved models. Make the right path the easy path.

2. What's the real ROI of AI-powered observability?​

Here's where the data gets interesting. Real-world AIOps deployments show measurable ROI:

These aren't marketing numbers—these are real operational improvements. Red Hat's State of Platform Engineering report confirms that organizations with mature platform engineering practices investing in AI-powered tools achieve 41% significantly higher success rates.

3. How do we support multi-model AI in our internal developer platforms?​

This is where platform engineering meets MLOps. Teams need infrastructure that supports:

  • Multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source models)
  • Model versioning and rollback
  • Cost tracking and optimization
  • Governance and compliance controls
  • Observability and debugging

Google Cloud's architecture guide shows that MLOps combines ML system development (Dev) with ML system operations (Ops), requiring automation and monitoring at every step.

The Current State: AI in Platform Engineering​

Platform Engineering's official blog identifies two perspectives on AI + Platform Engineering:

Perspective 1: AI-Powered IDPs AI enhances your Internal Developer Platform with automation, intelligent recommendations, and developer productivity tools.

Perspective 2: AI-Ready Platforms IDPs built to facilitate AI/ML workload deployment, providing the infrastructure for teams to ship AI features.

Most successful platform teams are tackling both simultaneously.

The Market Reality​

The generative AI market is projected to grow from $11.3 billion in 2023 to $51.8 billion by 2028 at a compound annual growth rate of 35.6%, according to Research and Markets.

Red Hat's survey of 1,000 platform engineers and IT decision makers found that 94% of organizations identify AI as either 'Critical' or 'Important' to the future of platform engineering.

The AI-Powered Platform Stack: What's Actually Working​

Let's break down the tools and approaches that teams are successfully deploying in production.

1. AI Governance and AI Gateways​

The first line of defense against Shadow AI is providing a blessed path through an AI governance platform with LLM integration controls.

Portkey - Production stack for Gen AI builders

  • Access to 100+ LLMs through a unified API
  • 50+ pre-built guardrails for security and compliance
  • SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance
  • Automated content filtering and PII detection
  • Comprehensive observability and governance

TrueFoundry - Kubernetes-native AI infrastructure

Both platforms solve the same core problem: give developers AI capabilities within governed boundaries.

💡 Key Takeaway

Portkey and TrueFoundry offer production-ready AI governance with 100+ LLMs, 50+ security guardrails, and SOC 2/HIPAA/GDPR compliance. Route all AI API calls through an AI gateway to gain visibility, prevent data leaks, and control costs.

2. AI-Enhanced Internal Developer Platforms (IDPs)​

Building an internal developer portal with AI capabilities improves developer experience dramatically.

Backstage AI Plugins

Spotify's Backstage, the leading open-source internal developer portal, is getting AI superpowers:

  • AiKA (AI Knowledge Assistant) - Spotify's chatbot that brings knowledge sharing to the next level, deployed to production in December 2023
  • RAG AI Assistant by Roadie - Enables natural language queries grounded in your documentation and metadata, surfacing answers from TechDocs, OpenAPI specs, and tech insights
  • Backchat GenAI Plugin - Integrates self-hosted LLM interfaces for private, local AI interactions

Slaptijack's guide on bringing AI to Backstage shows how to build an LLM-powered developer portal from scratch.

3. AI-Powered Infrastructure as Code​

The promise: describe what you want, get working infrastructure code. The reality is more nuanced.

GitHub Copilot with Terraform

Pulumi's AI Capabilities

  • Pulumi Copilot - Generate infrastructure code from natural language descriptions
  • Pulumi Neo - Industry's first AI agent for infrastructure that understands your entire context
  • Model Context Protocol Server - Enables AI coding assistants to codify cloud architectures

The Catch: NYU researchers studying GitHub Copilot found that 40% of generated code contained vulnerabilities from MITRE's "Top 25" Common Weakness Enumeration list in scenarios where security issues were possible. Styra highlights that policy guardrails like Open Policy Agent (OPA) are essential. You need a human in the loop.

4. MLOps and LLMOps Platforms for AI Workloads​

When your platform needs to support teams building and deploying AI models and LLM applications, you need MLOps infrastructure with comprehensive model management capabilities.

Platform Comparison:

PlatformBest ForKey AdvantageLearning Curve
KubeflowCustom ML solutions, large teamsContainer orchestration, full controlSteep
MLflowExperiment tracking, model versioningSimple, framework-agnosticModerate
Vertex AIGCP-native teamsManaged Kubeflow, tight GCP integrationLow
LangGraph PlatformLLM applications, agentsOne-click deploy, built-in persistenceLow

Superwise's comparison guide explains that Kubeflow solves infrastructure and experiment tracking, while MLflow only solves experiment tracking and model versioning. Vertex AI offers Kubeflow's capabilities with managed infrastructure.

For LLM-specific workloads, LangGraph Platform is now generally available, offering infrastructure for deploying and managing agents at scale with three deployment options: Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid, and Fully Self-Hosted.

5. AI Observability and AIOps for Incident Management​

This is where AI delivers immediate, measurable value for operational efficiency and incident management.

What AIOps Platforms Actually Do:

  • Ingests cross-domain data (metrics, logs, events, topology)
  • Applies ML for pattern recognition to uncover root causes
  • Reduces alert noise through intelligent correlation
  • Automates incident response and remediation
  • Predicts issues before they impact users

Leading Platforms:

  • Elastic AIOps - Reduces alert noise by 90%, MELT (Metrics, Events, Logs, Traces) integration
  • LogicMonitor - AI-driven observability with incident automation
  • IBM AIOps - Enterprise-grade with cross-domain visibility

AWS's AIOps guide explains how AI applies machine learning, NLP, and generative AI to synthesize insights, while Red Hat's explanation emphasizes automating manual tasks to reduce human error and free teams for strategic work.

6. AI Code Assistants and Developer Productivity​

AI coding tools and AI pair programming are transforming developer experience and productivity. The data is compelling: GitHub's research surveying over 2,000 developers shows those using GitHub Copilot as their AI code assistant report:

  • 60-75% higher job satisfaction - feeling more fulfilled, less frustrated, and able to focus on satisfying work
  • 55% faster task completion - completing tasks in 1 hour 11 minutes vs 2 hours 41 minutes without AI coding tools
  • 87% preserved mental effort on repetitive tasks, staying in the flow (73%)

Platform Team Adoption of AI Code Assistants:

According to VentureBeat's analysis:

  • GitHub Copilot dominates enterprise adoption (82% among large organizations)
  • Claude Code leads overall adoption (53%)
  • 49% of organizations pay for more than one AI coding tool
  • 26% specifically use both GitHub and Claude simultaneously

UI Bakery's comparison shows Cursor AI offers a holistic AI developer experience built into a custom VS Code fork, while Copilot is more of a plugin fitting into any IDE.

Best Practices for AI Tools for Developers:

  • Deploy AI code assistants through your internal developer platform with governance guardrails
  • Implement code review requirements for AI-generated code
  • Track usage and measure developer productivity impact using DORA metrics
  • Provide training on effective AI pair programming and prompt engineering

💡 Key Takeaway

GitHub Copilot users complete tasks 55% faster (1 hour 11 minutes vs 2 hours 41 minutes) and report 60-75% higher job satisfaction. GitHub Copilot leads enterprise adoption at 82%, while 49% of organizations pay for multiple AI coding tools simultaneously.

Real-World Success Stories: Who's Actually Doing This?​

Let's look at organizations that have successfully integrated AI into their platform engineering practices.

Microsoft's Customer Transformations​

Microsoft's customer transformations demonstrate real business impact:

  • Lumen Technologies: Reduced sales prep time from 4 hours to 15 minutes using Microsoft Copilot for Sales, projecting $50 million in annual time savings
  • Paytm: Used GitHub Copilot to launch Code Armor (cloud security automation), achieving 95%+ efficiency increase - reducing cloud account security from 2-3 man-days to 2-3 minutes

Google Cloud Case Studies​

Google's real-world Gen AI use cases:

  • Capgemini: Improved software engineering productivity, quality, and security with Code Assist, showing workload gains and more stable code quality
  • Five Sigma: Created an AI engine achieving 80% error reduction, 25% increase in adjuster productivity, and 10% reduction in claims cycle processing time

Platform Engineering Maturity Impact​

Red Hat's State of Platform Engineering report (October 2024) surveyed 1,000 platform engineers:

  • Organizations with mature platform engineering practices invest more in developer productivity tools (61%)
  • They track 7 KPIs on average (vs fewer for less mature teams)
  • 41% report significantly higher success rates

How to Implement AI in Platform Engineering: A Practical Framework​

Based on all this research, here's your roadmap for implementing AI in platform engineering and building AI-ready platforms without creating chaos.

Phase 1: Establish AI Governance (Weeks 1-4)​

1. Create an AI Registry

  • Catalog all AI tools currently in use (survey teams, check logs)
  • Identify Shadow AI governance gaps through network analysis
  • Document security and compliance requirements for LLM integration

2. Define AI Governance Policies

  • Approved LLM providers and models for AI code generation
  • Data classification policies (what data can go where)
  • Security requirements (encryption, API key management, isolation)
  • Cost allocation and budgets per team

3. Deploy an AI Gateway Platform

  • Choose an AI governance platform (Portkey, TrueFoundry)
  • Route all AI API calls through the LLM gateway
  • Implement authentication, rate limiting, and cost tracking
  • Enable AI observability for usage patterns

IBM's approach to Shadow AI detection and ManageEngine's governance recommendations show how to automatically discover new AI use cases and trigger governance workflows.

Phase 2: Improve Developer Experience with AI Tools (Weeks 5-12)​

1. Deploy Best AI Tools for Developers

  • Roll out AI code assistants: GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or Claude Code to development teams
  • Integrate AI coding tools with your internal developer portal for centralized management
  • Establish code review guidelines for AI code generation
  • Track adoption and measure developer productivity improvements

GitHub's research shows 55% faster task completion and Opsera's measurement framework helps measure true impact beyond hype.

2. Build AI-Enhanced Internal Developer Portal

  • Add AI chatbot to your Backstage internal developer platform
  • Implement RAG AI Assistant for documentation search
  • Enable natural language queries for service discovery
  • Auto-generate documentation using generative AI

3. IaC AI Assistance

Phase 3: Implement AI-Powered DevOps and Operations (Weeks 13-24)​

1. Deploy AIOps Platform for AI Observability and Incident Management

  • Choose an AIOps platform (Elastic, Datadog, New Relic)
  • Integrate with existing monitoring and observability tools
  • Configure intelligent alert correlation and noise reduction
  • Set up automated incident management and response for common issues

Red Hat's AIOps explanation provides implementation guidance.

💡 Key Takeaway

AIOps delivers measurable ROI: Edwin AI achieved 90% alert noise reduction, Hexaware improved efficiency by 50% and cut false positives from 523 to 22 weekly alerts (96% reduction), while Informatica reduced observability costs by 50%.

2. Enable Predictive Operations

  • Implement anomaly detection for infrastructure metrics
  • Set up capacity forecasting using ML
  • Create auto-remediation workflows for known issues
  • Measure MTTR improvement (target: 50% reduction) and outage reduction

3. Cost Optimization with AI

  • Deploy AI-powered FinOps tools
  • Implement cost anomaly detection
  • Enable automated rightsizing recommendations
  • Track savings from AI-driven optimization

Spot.io's guide on infrastructure optimization explains why this is critical for IDPs.

Phase 4: Support AI/ML Workloads and Model Management (Weeks 25-40)​

1. Deploy MLOps and LLMOps Infrastructure Choose based on your team's needs for model management:

ML-Ops.org provides comprehensive guides for MLOps implementation.

2. Implement Model Registry and Versioning

  • Deploy model registry (MLflow, Vertex AI Model Registry)
  • Set up model versioning and lineage tracking
  • Implement model approval workflows
  • Enable A/B testing and gradual rollouts

Neptune.ai's ML Model Registry guide covers best practices.

💡 Key Takeaway

Choose MLOps platforms based on team needs: Kubeflow for maximum control (steep learning curve), MLflow for simple experiment tracking (moderate curve), Vertex AI for GCP-native managed services (low curve), or LangGraph Platform for one-click LLM deployment (low curve).

3. Enable Self-Service AI Infrastructure

  • Create templates for common AI workloads
  • Provide GPU/TPU resource pools
  • Implement cost allocation per team/project
  • Set up autoscaling for inference workloads

Measuring Success: The KPIs That Actually Matter​

Puppet's platform engineering metrics guide identifies the top three critical metrics:

  1. Increased speed of product delivery
  2. Improved security and compliance
  3. Supported infrastructure

AI-Specific KPIs to Track​

Adoption Metrics:

  • % of developers using AI code assistants
  • API calls through AI gateway vs shadow AI
  • Teams deploying AI/ML models through your platform

Productivity Impact:

Operational Improvements:

Cost and Efficiency:

  • AI tool ROI (savings vs investment)
  • Infrastructure cost reduction from AI optimization
  • Developer time saved per week/month
  • Change failure rate impact

DX's engineering KPIs guide and Google Cloud's Gen AI KPIs post provide comprehensive measurement frameworks.

Important: Medium's article on rethinking developer productivity reminds us that developers often reinvest AI time savings into higher-quality work, so measure holistic impact, not just output volume.

Allow for a 3-6 month learning curve before drawing definitive conclusions about AI tool impact.

💡 Key Takeaway

Track three KPI categories: Adoption metrics (% developers using AI tools, shadow AI detection), Productivity impact (55% faster task completion, developer satisfaction via SPACE framework), and Operational improvements (90% alert noise reduction, 50-60% MTTR improvement, 96% false positive decrease).

The Challenges Nobody Talks About (And How to Handle Them)​

Challenge 1: AI Hallucinations in Production​

Mia-Platform's analysis points out that AI introduces inherent hallucination risk. AI should assist with automation and optimization suggestions, but leave final approval to humans.

Solution:

  • Implement automated testing for AI-generated code
  • Require human review for security-critical changes
  • Use AI as a copilot, not an autopilot
  • Track and learn from AI-introduced bugs

💡 Key Takeaway

40% of AI-generated code contains vulnerabilities according to NYU research. Implement three protection layers: policy guardrails (Open Policy Agent), mandatory human code review for security-critical changes, and automated security scanning (tfsec) for all AI-generated infrastructure code.

Challenge 2: Model Drift and Degradation​

AI models degrade over time as data patterns change. AWS's MLOps best practices recommend continuous monitoring.

Solution:

  • Implement model performance monitoring
  • Set up automated retraining pipelines
  • Define model retirement criteria
  • Create rollback procedures for degraded models

Challenge 3: The Trust Gap​

Stack Overflow's 2025 Developer Survey of over 49,000 developers found that trust in AI accuracy has fallen from 40% to just 29%, while 66% of developers report spending more time fixing "almost-right" AI-generated code. The number-one frustration (45% of respondents) is dealing with AI solutions that are almost right, but not quite.

Solution:

  • Provide training on effective AI usage and prompt engineering
  • Share success stories and best practices internally
  • Create feedback loops for AI tool improvement
  • Be transparent about AI limitations and known issues

Challenge 4: Security and Compliance​

SignalFire's guide on securing Shadow AI highlights risks of LLM misuse.

Solution:

  • Implement data loss prevention (DLP) for AI tools
  • Classify data and restrict AI access accordingly
  • Audit AI tool usage regularly
  • Maintain compliance documentation for AI systems

Challenge 5: Cost Explosion​

AI infrastructure and API costs can spiral quickly without governance.

Solution:

  • Set team-level budgets with alerts
  • Implement cost allocation tags
  • Use AI gateway for rate limiting and quotas
  • Optimize model selection (balance cost vs capability)

Learning Resources: Go Deeper​

📹 Essential Videos​

PlatformCon 2024 Talks:

📚 Key Reports and Research​

Industry Reports:

Academic and Technical:

🛠️ Tool Documentation​

AI Governance:

IDP AI Integration:

MLOps Platforms:

IaC AI Tools:

📊 Measurement and KPIs​

Metrics Frameworks:

Platform Engineering KPIs:

🎓 Courses and Training​

📖 Technical Guides​

Internal Resources:

External Resources:

The Bottom Line: From Hype to Production​

AI in platform engineering isn't coming—it's already here. The question isn't whether to adopt AI, but how to do it safely, effectively, and with proper governance.

The winners in 2025 will be platform teams that:

  1. Provide blessed paths instead of building walls - Make secure AI usage easy
  2. Measure actual outcomes, not just adoption - Track real productivity and reliability gains
  3. Balance innovation with control - Enable experimentation within guardrails
  4. Treat their platform as a product - Continuously discover what developers actually need

Start here:

Week 1: Audit current AI tool usage (official and shadow) Week 2: Choose and deploy an AI gateway for governance Week 3: Roll out AI code assistants with guidelines Week 4: Implement basic observability for AI usage

Then iterate, measure, and improve.

Remember: The goal isn't to chase every AI trend. It's to thoughtfully integrate AI capabilities that genuinely improve developer experience, operational reliability, and business outcomes.

The platform teams that succeed will be the ones that ask "Should we?" before "Can we?"

What's your biggest AI platform engineering challenge? Are you wrestling with Shadow AI governance? Trying to justify AIOps ROI? Building MLOps infrastructure from scratch? Share your experiences and questions in the comments.

For more platform engineering insights, check out our comprehensive technical guides and join the conversation in the Platform Engineering Community.