Skip to main content

Episode Outline: Why 70% of Platform Engineering Teams Fail

Story Planning​

NARRATIVE STRUCTURE: Mystery/Discovery

CENTRAL TENSION: Platform engineering teams are failing at an alarming rate (70%), costing millions and derailing careers. Why are technically excellent teams with smart engineers consistently unable to deliver value?

THROUGHLINE: From believing platform failures are technical problems to discovering they're actually product management and metrics failures—and the 5 predictive signals that separate success from disaster.

EMOTIONAL ARC:

  • Recognition moment: "We hired senior engineers, gave them budget, and 18 months later had nothing to show for it" (listener thinks: "I've seen this exact pattern")
  • Surprise moment: "Platforms don't fail because of bad technology choices—they fail because only 33% have product managers, and 45% can't prove ROI" (listener thinks: "Wait, it's not about the tech stack?")
  • Empowerment moment: "These 5 metrics predict success with startling accuracy—and you can measure all of them in the next 30 days" (listener thinks: "I know exactly what to do Monday morning")

Act Structure​

ACT 1: THE MYSTERY (2-3 minutes)​

Hook: August 1, 2012. 9:30 AM. Knight Capital deploys new trading software. By 10:15 AM, $440 million evaporated. The CEO later said: "We had the technology. We had smart people. What we didn't have was the right operating model."

Fast forward to 2025: 60-70% of platform engineering teams fail to deliver meaningful impact. 45% are disbanded within 18 months. These aren't startups with junior teams—these are Fortune 500 companies hiring senior engineers with $450K budgets.

Stakes:

  • Financial: A 3-person platform team costs $450K/year minimum. At scale (25 engineers), that's $3.75M annually
  • Career: Platform leaders get 12-18 months to prove value before teams get restructured
  • Organizational: Failed platforms mean developer productivity stays stuck, on-call burden increases, deployment times don't improve

Promise: We're going to solve a mystery. Why do technically excellent platform teams fail? And more importantly—what are the 5 metrics that predict success with startling accuracy?

Key Points:

  • The Knight Capital story: $440M lost in 45 minutes because of operational failure, not technical failure
  • The shocking statistics: 70% failure rate, 45% disbanded in 18 months (Gartner, Puppet State of Platform Engineering)
  • The paradox: These teams have senior engineers, modern tools, executive buy-in—yet they fail
  • The cost: $450K minimum per year, careers on the line, organizational momentum lost

ACT 2: THE INVESTIGATION (6-7 minutes)​

Discovery 1: The Product Management Gap (2 min) Only 33% of platform teams have dedicated product managers, despite 52% saying PMs are crucial to success. That 19-point gap is the smoking gun.

The evidence:

  • Spotify Backstage: 99% voluntary adoption (has PM)
  • External Backstage adopters: 10% average adoption (most lack PM)
  • The pattern: Teams with PMs are 3x more likely to achieve over 50% adoption

What goes wrong without a PM:

  • Platform teams build what's technically interesting instead of what developers actually need
  • No roadmap prioritization—everything is equally important
  • Can't say "no" to feature requests—platform becomes a junk drawer
  • Example: Backstage implementations that overwhelm developers with 50+ plugins

Discovery 2: The Metrics Blindness (2 min) 45% of platform teams don't measure anything meaningful. They can tell you uptime, but not whether developers are more productive.

The 2024 DORA Report bombshell:

  • Platform teams DECREASED throughput by 8%
  • Platform teams DECREASED stability by 14%
  • Platforms make things worse before they make them better
  • But teams without baselines never know if they've crossed into "better"

What this looks like in practice:

  • Team builds beautiful CI/CD pipeline
  • Deploys it to production
  • Can't prove it saved any time
  • Gets cut in next budget round
  • Real example: "We saved 30% deployment time" - 30% of what? They never measured before.

Discovery 3: The Force Adoption Trap (90 sec) Mandating platform adoption creates resistance, shadow IT, and developer resentment.

The psychology:

  • Developers are builders who value autonomy
  • Forced tools feel like surveillance and control
  • They'll route around platforms to "get real work done"
  • NPS scores drop below -20 (legacy platform territory)

The Spotify counter-example:

  • Made Backstage the easiest path, not the required path
  • 99% voluntary adoption
  • Developers chose it because it made them more productive

Complication: The Real Failure Pattern (90 sec) Here's where it gets interesting. The technical decisions don't predict failure. You can fail with Backstage or succeed with homegrown. You can fail on AWS or succeed on bare metal.

The pattern that predicts failure:

  • Treating platform engineering as an engineering problem instead of a product problem
  • Hiring engineers when you need product managers
  • Measuring outputs (features shipped) instead of outcomes (developer productivity)
  • Building for hypothetical future scale instead of current pain points

The irony: The engineering is usually excellent. The platforms are technically sound. But nobody uses them.

ACT 3: THE SOLUTION (3-4 minutes)​

Synthesis: The 5 Predictive Metrics (2 min)

These metrics predict success with remarkable accuracy:

1. Product Manager Exists (Y/N)

  • Binary metric: Do you have a dedicated PM or not?
  • If no: 3x less likely to achieve 50% adoption
  • If yes: Can prioritize ruthlessly, say no strategically, build incrementally

2. Pre-Platform Baseline Established

  • Measured BEFORE platform work starts
  • Current deployment time, MTTR, time to onboard new engineers
  • Without baseline: Can't prove ROI, can't defend budget
  • With baseline: "We reduced deployment time from 45 minutes to 6 minutes"

3. Developer NPS over 20

  • Over 0 is good, over 20 is great, over 50 is amazing, over 80 is top percentile
  • Spotify achieved 76 NPS for Backstage
  • Under -20 means active resistance (legacy platform territory)
  • Quarterly measurement shows trend

4. Voluntary Adoption over 50% Within 12 Months

  • Adoption curve: 0-6 months innovators (10-20%), 6-12 months mainstream (target 50%+)
  • Forced adoption doesn't count—measures whether developers CHOOSE the platform
  • If under 50% at 12 months: something fundamentally wrong with value proposition

5. Time to First Value Under 30 Days

  • From "I want to try the platform" to "I got real value"
  • 7 days or less: Excellent (GitHub Actions territory)
  • 30 days: Acceptable (gives team chance to prove ROI before losing attention)
  • Over 30 days: Platform too complex, will lose pilot teams

Application: The Decision Framework (90 sec)

When to build a platform team:

  • Under 10 engineers: Don't. Overhead exceeds benefits.
  • Around 30 engineers: Platform work becomes someone's full-time job. Consider 1 engineer.
  • 100+ engineers: Pain points justify dedicated team. Start with 3 people (1 PM, 2 engineers).
  • 1000+ engineers: Full platform team of 15-25 can deliver 380% ROI ($18M value on $3.75M cost).

First 90 days playbook:

  1. Establish baselines (deployment time, MTTR, onboarding time)
  2. Hire PM BEFORE second engineer
  3. Interview 10+ developers—find common pain points
  4. Build smallest MVP that solves ONE pain point
  5. Find 2-3 pilot teams (early adopters, willing to give feedback)
  6. Measure NPS at 30 days
  7. Target under 30 days time to first value
  8. Track voluntary adoption weekly

Red flags to kill the project:

  • NPS under 0 after 6 months despite iterations
  • Under 10% adoption after 6 months
  • Can't establish measurable baseline
  • Organization under 100 engineers without acute pain

Empowerment: What You Can Do Monday (30 sec)

  1. Check: Do we have a PM? If no, this is your top priority.
  2. Measure: What's our current state? (deployment time, MTTR, onboarding time)
  3. Survey: Send NPS survey to developers who've tried the platform
  4. Calculate: Time to first value—how long does it take a new team to get value?
  5. Decide: Based on these 5 metrics, are we on track? If not, what changes by next quarter?

The platforms that succeed aren't the ones with the best technology. They're the ones that measure the right things and treat platform engineering as a product discipline.

Story Elements​

KEY CALLBACKS:

  • Knight Capital story (open with it, return to it in Act 3: "Knight Capital had the technology and smart people—what they lacked was the operating model and metrics")
  • The 33% with PMs vs 52% who say PMs matter (the 19-point gap that explains everything)
  • "Platforms make things worse before they make them better" (introduce in Act 2, explain why metrics matter in Act 3)

NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES:

  • The Anchoring Statistic: 70% failure rate, 45% disbanded in 18 months (return to it throughout)
  • The Case Study Arc: Spotify's Backstage (99% adoption) vs external adopters (10% adoption)—same technology, different outcomes
  • The Thought Experiment: "What if we hired a PM before the second engineer?" (test assumptions)
  • The Devil's Advocate Dance:
    • Jordan: "Surely the technology choice matters—Backstage vs homegrown?"
    • Alex: "That's what everyone thinks. But look at the data—teams succeed and fail with both. The PM gap is the predictor."

SUPPORTING DATA:

  • Knight Capital: $440M loss in 45 minutes (August 2012, SEC filings)
  • 60-70% platform teams fail to deliver impact (Gartner 2024, Puppet State of Platform Engineering 2024)
  • 45% disbanded within 18 months (Gartner)
  • 33% have PMs, 52% say PMs crucial (Team Topologies research)
  • Spotify: 99% voluntary adoption, 76 NPS (Spotify Engineering Blog)
  • External Backstage: 10% average adoption (Backstage Community Survey 2024)
  • 2024 DORA Report: -8% throughput, -14% stability initially
  • Platform team costs: $450K (3 engineers) to $3.75M (25 engineers), $18M value at scale = 380% ROI

Quality Checklist​

  • Throughline is clear (technical excellence ≠ success; product thinking + metrics = success)
  • Hook is compelling (Knight Capital $440M loss + 70% failure rate grabs attention)
  • Each section builds (Mystery → Investigation → Solution with clear progression)
  • Insights connect (PM gap → Metrics blindness → Force adoption → Real pattern → 5 Metrics framework)
  • Emotional beats land (Recognition: "I've seen this", Surprise: "It's not the tech", Empowerment: "5 metrics I can measure Monday")
  • Callbacks create unity (Knight Capital returns, 19-point PM gap explains everything, baseline measurement ties to ROI)
  • Payoff satisfies (Opening mystery resolved: technical teams fail for product/metrics reasons; concrete 5-metric framework + 90-day playbook)
  • Narrative rhythm (Mystery hook → Investigation discoveries → Resolution framework—feels like detective story)
  • Technical depth maintained (Specific numbers, real examples, concrete metrics—not dumbed down)
  • Listener value clear (Monday action items: check PM, measure baseline, NPS survey, calculate time-to-value, decide based on 5 metrics)

Episode Metadata​

Episode: 00011 Slug: platform-failures Title: Why 70% of Platform Engineering Teams Fail (And the 5 Metrics That Predict Success) Duration Target: 12-14 minutes Related Blog Post: /blog/2025-10-28-why-platform-engineering-teams-fail